Boston Scientific vs Johnson & Johnson: Battle for the Stent Market
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1d606/1d6062560e568720323b058bce2e2fcad3352426" alt="LinkedIn IBS CDC"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fdd65/fdd6583944665f23c90dd98d7e76f8040eb0d6c0" alt="Twitter IBS CDC"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/90469/9046996f5b3d27df42fcaf8fc2795502a369b10b" alt="Facebook IBS CDC"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ccb11/ccb1161894984e15654ac3ae3c6638bc994e1c4a" alt="RSS Feed IBS CDC RSS Feed"
Code : COM0033
|
Region : USA
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() OR |
||
Introduction:Stent is a revolutionary medical device that promises to save lives and obviate even more number of open-heart surgeries. This medical device, measuring 33 mm and weighing 27-thousandth part of a gram, is used in angioplasty procedures to prevent arteries from blocking the flow of blood, thereby reducing the risk of a heart stroke. In this high-precision manufacturing of stent devices, only four companies battled for the market leadership – Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific, Guidant and Medtronic. Introduced in 1994 by Johnson & Johnson, the first stent generated sales of over $1 billion and commanded 90% of the US market. After three years, Guidant introduced an enhanced version and, within 45 days, emerged as the market leader with 70% of the market. In the following years, Minneapolis-based Medtronic and Boston Scientific, after rebuffing J&J's hostile takeover bid, entered the scenario with their stents. Between 1998 and 2003, it was neither J&J nor Boston Scientific that was themarket leader; Guidant with around 40% was ruling the market followed closely by Medtronic. The five years also witnessed a spate of lawsuits concerning patent infringements and inferior manufacturing processes... |
|
For Case Books
Click Here >> For Case eBooks Click Here >> |